Module Evaluation Form


    Scientific Programming is a new course that is part of the new Emphasis in Computational Science at Wofford College. For improvement of the course, the Emphasis, and the course materials, your careful, honest, and thorough responses to the following questionnaire is truly appreciated. You are strongly encouraged to provide additional comments and suggestions below each question.


Email Address:   
Affiliation (school, business, etc.):
Reason(s) for viewing this Module:


1. I understood the material in the module.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the material in the module:



2. The writing style in the module is clear.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the writing style in the module:



3. The writing style in the module is at the right level.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the level of the writing style in the module:



4. The figures and tables are illustrative.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the figures and tables in the module:



5. The scientific applications are explained well.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the scientific applications in the module:



6. The Quick Review Questions helped me understand the material.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the Quick Review Questions in the module:



7. The exercises helped me understand the material.
  Agree Strongly    Agree   Neutral or No Opinion   Disagree   Disagree Strongly   Statement not Applicable 

Comments on the exercises in the module:



8.How do you rate the appearance of the website as a whole?
  Excellent    Very Good    Good    Average    Below Average    Poor 

9.How do you rate the appearance of this particular module?
  Excellent    Very Good    Good    Average    Below Average    Poor 

10.What improvements could we make with regards to the appearance of the module and website?